Some resources for OB course topics – – –
1. What is an Organisation?
When is it an organisation and when not?
There are many ways to define ‘organisation’. After all, people do a lot of organising and much of it without conscious thought. For the purposes of this blog, an organisation has two defining characteristics:
- It consists of a group of people who have a common purpose.
- There is a hierarchical structure so that some organisational members have authority over others.
Organisation as assemblage
The above definition, of course, leaves much out. We might also think of an organisation as an institutional assemblage which includes many kinds of components, not just people but also resources of other kinds, such as legal contracts, buildings, raw materials and so on.
Inside and outside
Organisational behaviour (OB) is the study of the individuals and groups within the organisation. A structure of authority and responsibility is a defining characteristic of organisations so the relationships between leaders and subordinates is large part of the discipline.
Relationships with external stakeholders are not part of OB. For example, the relationship between the organisation and its customers is covered by marketing. However, relationships with external stakeholders do influence OB. The need to maintain legitimacy, for example, is one of the key influences on OB.
2. Employee’s View
2.1 Marx: Alienation
Ritzer & Stepinsky (2014) Sociological Theory, NY: McGraw Hill, pp. 53-55.
“First, the fact that labor is external to the worker, ie. it does not belong to his essential being; that in his work, therefore, he does not affirm himself but denies himself, does not feel content but unhappy, does not develop freely his physical and mental energy but mortifies his body and ruins his mind. The worker therefore only feels himself outside his work, and in his work feels outside himself. He is at home when he is not working, and when he is working he is not at home. His labor therefore is not voluntary, but coerced; it is forced labour. It is therefore not the satisfaction of a need: it is a means to satisfy needs external to it.”
Marx, The Class Struggles in France, 1848-1850, NY: International Publishers, p.72.
According to Ritzer and Stepinsky, alienation has four components. Firstly, workers are alienated from their own productive activity because they do not produce what they want to produce or need. Secondly, they are alienated from the goods or services that they produce because they do not own them. Thirdly, they are alienated from their fellow workers because the mode of capitalist production turns workers into isolated individuals. Fourthly, they are alienated from their own potential; because they are controlled, they become like machines.
2.2 Paul Willis’s Study: Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs
This is a participant observer study conducted in the late 1970s. The researcher observed a group of white working class boys making the transition from school to work. Willis was inspired to address the problem of explaining why some groups in society, despite the opportunities to choose otherwise, deliberately seek boring, meaningless and badly paid work.
A good summary of Willis’s book is to be found in Lee Harvey’s Critical Social Research.
Critique of the research methods and validity of the findings.
Paul Willis (1981). Learning to Labour, NY: Colombia University Press.
3. Scientific Management
3.1 Adam Smith – Division of Labour
Dr. Bart van Heerikhuizen, University of Amsterdam, Example of the pin factory
3.2 Interchangeable Parts
Eli Whitney and interchangeable parts
3.3 Frederick Taylor – Scientific Management
Frederick Taylor – 5 principles of scientific management (David Body, Management: An Introduction, 2014, Harlow, UK: Pearson, p.44).
- Use scientific methods to find the one best way of doing a task
- Select the person with the best fit for the job in terms of mental and physical characteristics
- Train the worker to follow the defined process precisely
- Use financial incentives that reward the worker for doing the work in the prescribed way eg. piece work
- All organising and planning to be done by managers, none by workers
3.4 Henry Ford – moving assembly line
Fordism could be described as the application of electric motors to the process of production. Ford’s insight was into how to use a technology that had been available for some time.
In the latter half of the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century capitalism and scientific management techniques were often equated. This viewpoint emphasised the inhuman principle in classical management practice that sought to treat human beings like machines. However, this viewpoint also tended to ignore the rapid rise in standards of nutrition, education and healthcare, and in living standards generally, that were engendered by the rise in wealth brought about by capitalism.
3.5 An Example of Scientific Management
by Crystal Galyean
“The Levitts certainly did not invent the business of building suburbs, but in many ways, they perfected it. Abraham, a horticultural enthusiast, was heavily involved in the landscaping and gardening of the community. Alfred, the quieter of the two sons, experimented with progressive ways of designing and constructing homes while his brother Bill marketed and sold them with vigor. Bill later became the public face of the company, loved (and later reviled), gracing magazine covers and dubbed the “King of Suburbia.”
The Levitts experimented with and implemented wholly new methods of building a community, taking division of labor and efficiency to the extreme, transforming “a cottage industry into a major manufacturing process.” They divided the construction of each home into twenty-seven steps starting with the laying of a concrete base. Construction workers were trained to do one step at each house (which were spaced 60 feet apart) instead of building each house up from scratch individually.”
3.6 Elton Mayo – Human Relations
Marks a shift in thinking from the objectivism of Taylorism to a theory of social systems and the notion of ‘social man’.
4. What do Managers do?
4.1 Henri Fayol
– managers are pro-active planners
- Division of Work
- Authority and Responsibility
- Unity of Command
- Unity of Direction
- Subordination of Individual Interest to General Interest
- Chain of Command
- Stability of Tenure and Personnel
- Esprit de Corps
4.2 Henry Mintzberg
– managers are reactive problem solvers
Style theories: Lewin/ Likert/ Bass and Avolio/ Quinn
Full-range leadership theory
Extrinsic/ intrinsic rewards
Abraham Maslow: Hierarchy of Needs
Frederick Herzberg: two factor theory
Stacey Adams: Equity theory
Victor Vroom: Expectancy theory
Visual perception – what you see is not what you get
Perception of authority: Milgram / Zimbardo
Group conformity: Asche
Psychometric testing: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
James Flynn makes some illuminating points about the history of IQ:
Why our IQ levels are higher than our grandparents’
9. Organisational Learning
Learning on the job
Learning together/ learning to work together
Behaviourism: classical and operant conditioning
Argyris and Schon: single and double loop learning
Senge: the learning organisation
Levels of culture
- Hofstede – Hofstede Insights web site contains useful information, including interactive country comparisons
- Globe Project – ongoing culture and leadership survey. Web site which has downloadable data in Excel format.
- World Values Survey – web site includes animated charts which show changes in national culture over time and downloadable data in Excel format.
- Schwartz –
- Peters & Waterman
- Deal & Kennedy
- Cameron and Quinn – Competing Values Framework
11.1 Kurt Lewin: “organisation as ice cube”
Force Field Analysis
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper Row.
Lewin’s essay Group Decision and Social Change (1947) describes the three stages of planned change: Unfreeze, move, refreeze. (Some brief notes on this essay).
Lewin, K., (1947). Group decision and social change. Readings in social psychology, 3(1), pp.197-211.
11.2 Kotter: 8 stages of change
12. Team Working
Katzenbach and Smith
Significant article in Harvard Business Review in 1994.
Talks about the power of small teams which is illustrated in this Apple recruitment video.
Web site has details of 9 team roles which fall into three categories
People working in teams reduce their efforts, ‘slack off’, in proportion to the size of the team. This only applies when the team members are not individually motivated to do the task. When some members of the team are slacking it encourages other team members to do likewise. This is an aspect of social facilitation theory.
Weber’s ideal types
Example of bureaucratic thinking:
“At UPS, we take a sincere interest in the well-being of our team members and treat everyone equally. In the words of Jim Casey:
‘The policy of impartiality means that everyone is treated equally; everybody has an equal opportunity; one person is on a par with all the others; one can advance only because of more capability than others.’
A major factor in providing everyone with an equal opportunity to grow and rise in the ranks is the practice of not hiring relations or friends, avoiding the potential for favouritism.”
from Ron Wallace, Leadership Lessons from a UPS Driver, 2016, Berrett-Keohler, NY, pp.9-10.
Mechanistic and organic organisation